Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6020 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6020

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 6020
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 6020

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v10
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (2)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 10 score – 439K vs 420K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6020
  • Announced 1 year and 5 months later

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 6020

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695 +4%
439099
Dimensity 6020
420294
CPU 156508 133960
GPU 82587 70915
Memory 95123 110349
UX 105691 105070
Total score 439099 420294
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 106.3 MB/sec 94.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 58.3 pages/sec 51.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 79.4 Mpixels/sec 66.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 43.4 images/sec 37.1 images/sec
HDR 68.1 Mpixels/sec 58.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.37 images/sec 4.95 images/sec
Photo processing 20.9 images/sec 19.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.86 Mpixels/sec 2.53 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 7 FPS -
Score 1199 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 -
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 6020

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
Execution units 2 2
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 486.4 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 March 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6833
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6020 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2274 (53.9%)
1944 (46.1%)
Total votes: 4218

Related Comparisons

1. Snapdragon 695 or Helio G99
2. Snapdragon 695 or Dimensity 920
3. Snapdragon 695 or Snapdragon 778G
4. Snapdragon 695 or Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
5. Snapdragon 695 or Snapdragon 732G
6. Snapdragon 695 or Dimensity 700
7. Snapdragon 695 or Dimensity 930
8. Snapdragon 695 or Dimensity 1080
9. Dimensity 6020 or Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
10. Dimensity 6020 or Dimensity 930
Compare other chipsets (170+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6020 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
Avatar
Dhairya Wadhwani 11 February 2024 07:23
Although the 695 model may be slightly superior, Dimensity is greatly underrated compared to it, particularly given the 695's current bad reputation from being overused by companies. This allows you to secure better deals on DM6020 phones, while compromising minimally.
+21 Reply
Avatar
Ahmad 15 August 2023 17:47
Why are people voting for 6020? 695 has better antutu scores and better CPU and gpu.
+467 Reply
Avatar
Hemanth 25 December 2023 07:17
The 6020 is more budget-friendly and involves very few compromises when compared to the 695.
+67 Reply
Avatar
Narayan Sharma 30 January 2024 05:48
Hemanth, In the early era, Dimensity was used for testing only. Snapdragon met all qualifications early on. At that time, it was known as Qualcomm Snapdragon. Throughout time, Qualcomm has been the best all-rounder. However, currently, some processors excel in Dimensity.
+17 Reply
Avatar
... 17 February 2024 02:38
Since MediaTek supports 2K video capture and playback, it may not be stellar, but it's superior to the 695.
+19 Reply
EnglishРусский